
Am J Psychiatry 163:1646-b, September 2006
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.9.1646-b
© 2006 American Psychiatric Association
Dr. Spiegel Replies
DAVID SPIEGEL, M.D. Stanford, Calif.
To the Editor: My point in referring to Pierre Janets use of the term desagregation mentale was not to misattribute the English term dissociation to a poor translation of Janets language, but rather to highlight his superior understanding of the phenomenon, which involves not a mere separation of elements of identity, memory, and consciousness but rather a failure of the normal processes of integration of these elements that would normally aggregate. While Janet may have used the more common term dissociation as well, it is clear that he thought of the problem as a failure of integration rather than a mere separation. At a time when modern neuroscience is uncovering specific brain regions (perirhinal cortex and hippocampus) involved in binding previously disparate aspects of perception (1), it behooves us to recognize early thinkers who identified problems in integration of various aspects of perception, identity, memory, and consciousness, rather than merely describing their dissociation or disintegration.
Reference
- Taylor KI, Moss HE, Stamatakis EA, Tyler LK: Binding crossmodal object features in perirhinal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103:82398244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Get information about faster international access.
a>
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2006
American Psychiatric Association.
All rights reserved.
Home
| Search
| Current Issue
| Past Issues
| Subscribe
| All APPI Journals
| Help
| Contact Us
|