The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Am J Psychiatry 2008; 165:855-862
(published online May 1, 2008; doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07081340)
© 2008 American Psychiatric Association
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text
* Full Text (PDF)
* CME: Take the course for this article:
AJP CME Course for July 2008: Empirically Derived Decision Trees for the Tr...
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
* Citation Map
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
* Articles by Andreescu, C.
* Articles by Reynolds, C. F.
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Andreescu, C.
* Articles by Reynolds, C. F., III
Related Collections
* Geriatric Psychiatry
* Anxiety Disorders (General)
* Depression
* Antidepressants
*Related Articles

Empirically Derived Decision Trees for the Treatment of Late-Life Depression

Carmen Andreescu, M.D., Benoit H. Mulsant, M.D., Patricia R. Houck, M.S., Ellen M. Whyte, M.D., Sati Mazumdar, Ph.D., Alexandre Y. Dombrovski, M.D., Bruce G. Pollock, M.D., Ph.D., and Charles F. Reynolds III, M.D.

OBJECTIVE: Several predictors of treatment response in late-life depression have been reported in the literature. The aim of this analysis was to develop a clinically useful algorithm that would allow clinicians to predict which patients will likely respond to treatment and thereby guide clinical decision making. METHOD: A total of 461 patients with late-life depression were treated under structured conditions for up to 12 weeks and assessed weekly with the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17). The authors developed a hierarchy of predictors of treatment response using signal-detection theory. The authors developed two models, one minimizing false predictions of future response and one minimizing false predictions of future nonresponse, to offer clinicians two clinically useful treatment algorithms. RESULTS: In the first model, early symptom improvement (defined by the relative change in HAM-D-17 total score from baseline to week 4), lower baseline anxiety, and an older age of onset predict response at 12 weeks. In the second model, early symptom improvement represents the principal guide in tailoring treatment, followed by baseline anxiety level, baseline sleep disturbance, and—for a minority of patients—the adequacy of previous antidepressant treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our two models, developed to help clinicians in different clinical circumstances, illustrate the possibility of tailoring the treatment of late-life depression based on clinical characteristics and confirm the importance of early observed changes in clinical status.


Related Articles:

Personalizing the Care of Geriatric Depression
George S. Alexopoulos
Am J Psychiatry 2008 165: 790-792. [Full Text] [PDF]

In This Issue
Am J Psychiatry 2008 165: A42. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
G. S. Alexopoulos
Personalizing the Care of Geriatric Depression
Am J Psychiatry, July 1, 2008; 165(7): 790 - 792.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2008 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org