Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Lissek, S. Articles by Grillon, C. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Lissek, S. Articles by Grillon, C. Anxiety Disorders (General) Other Diagnostic Tools

Elevated Fear Conditioning to Socially Relevant Unconditioned Stimuli in Social Anxiety Disorder

OBJECTIVE: Though conditioned fear has long been acknowledged as an important etiologic mechanism in social anxiety disorder, past psychophysiological experiments have found no differences in general conditionability among social anxiety patients using generally aversive but socially nonspecific unconditioned stimuli (e.g., unpleasant odors and painful pressure). The authors applied a novel fear conditioning paradigm consisting of socially relevant unconditioned stimuli of critical facial expressions and verbal feedback. This study represents the first effort to assess the conditioning correlates of social anxiety disorder within an ecologically enhanced paradigm. METHOD: Subjects with social anxiety disorder and age- and gender-matched healthy comparison subjects underwent differential classical conditioning. Conditioned stimuli included images of three neutral facial expressions, each of which was paired with one of three audiovisual unconditioned stimuli: negative insults with critical faces (US_neg), positive compliments with happy faces (US_pos), or neutral comments with neutral faces (US_neu). The conditioned response was measured as the fear-potentiation of the startle-blink reflex elicited during presentation of the conditioned stimuli. RESULTS: Only social anxiety subjects demonstrated fear conditioning in response to facial expressions, as the startle-blink reflex was potentiated by the CS_neg versus both CS_neu and CS_pos among those with the disorder, while healthy comparison subjects displayed no evidence of conditioned startle-potentiation. Such group differences in conditioning were independent of levels of anxiety to the unconditioned stimulus, implicating associative processes rather than increased unconditioned stimulus reactivity as the active mechanism underlying enhanced conditioned startle-potentiation among social anxiety subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Results support a conditioning contribution to social anxiety disorder and underscore the importance of disorder-relevant unconditioned stimuli when studying the conditioning correlates of pathologic anxiety.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Blair, M. Geraci, J. Devido, D. McCaffrey, G. Chen, M. Vythilingam, P. Ng, N. Hollon, M. Jones, R. J. R. Blair, et al. Neural Response to Self- and Other Referential Praise and Criticism in Generalized Social Phobia Arch Gen Psychiatry, October 1, 2008; 65(10): 1176 - 1184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2008 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us