Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Email this article to a Colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Articles & Searches Download to citation manager Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Articles by Kessler, R. C. Articles by Wang, P. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Citation Articles by Kessler, R. C. Articles by Wang, P. S. Costs, Cost Analysis Bipolar Disorder Depression Interviews Epidemiology Related Article

Prevalence and Effects of Mood Disorders on Work Performance in a Nationally Representative Sample of U.S. Workers

OBJECTIVE: Research on the workplace costs of mood disorders has focused largely on major depressive episodes. Bipolar disorder has been overlooked both because of the failure to distinguish between major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder and by the failure to evaluate the workplace costs of mania/hypomania. METHOD: The National Comorbidity Survey Replication assessed major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder with the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and work impairment with the WHO Health and Work Performance Questionnaire. A regression analysis of major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder predicting Health and Work Performance Questionnaire scores among 3,378 workers was used to estimate the workplace costs of mood disorders. RESULTS: A total of 1.1% of the workers met CIDI criteria for 12-month bipolar disorder (I or II), and 6.4% meet criteria for 12-month major depressive disorder. Bipolar disorder was associated with 65.5 and major depressive disorder with 27.2 lost workdays per ill worker per year. Subgroup analysis showed that the higher work loss associated with bipolar disorder than with major depressive disorder was due to more severe and persistent depressive episodes in those with bipolar disorder than in those with major depressive disorder rather than to stronger effects of mania/hypomania than depression. CONCLUSIONS: Employer interest in workplace costs of mood disorders should be broadened beyond major depressive disorder to include bipolar disorder. Effectiveness trials are needed to study the return on employer investment of coordinated programs for workplace screening and treatment of bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.

Related Article:

In This Issue
Am J Psychiatry 2006 163: A64. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J P E Bonde Psychosocial factors at work and risk of depression: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2008; 65(7): 438 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. S. Sachs Bipolar Disorder Clinical Synthesis: Where Does the Evidence Lead? Focus, January 1, 2007; 5(1): 3 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Cook Employment Barriers for Persons With Psychiatric Disabilities: Update of a Report for the President's Commission Psychiatr Serv, October 1, 2006; 57(10): 1391 - 1405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2006 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us