The American Journal of Psychiatry
Journal Home Search Current Issue Past Issues Subscribe All APPI Journals Help Contact Us
 
Quicksearch
Advanced Search
Or Search All APPI Journals
This Article
* Full Text (PDF)
* Alert me when this article is cited
* Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
* Email this article to a Colleague
* Similar articles in this journal
* Similar articles in PubMed
* Alert me to new issues of the journal
* Add to My Articles & Searches
* Download to citation manager
* reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
* Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
* Articles by Hoge, S. K.
* Articles by Greer, A.
* Search for Related Content
PubMed
* PubMed Citation
* Articles by Hoge, S. K.
* Articles by Greer, A.

Am J Psychiatry 1989; 146:170-175
Copyright © 1989 by American Psychiatric Association


REGULAR ARTICLES

An empirical comparison of the stone and dangerousness criteria for civil commitment

SK Hoge, PS Appelbaum and A Greer
University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Worcester 01605.

Massachusetts civil commitment criteria were compared in an emergency setting with a set of criteria developed by Dr. Alan Stone. Contrary to expectations, the Stone criteria proved to be more restrictive in a sample of 503 patients. Few patients would be newly committable under the Stone criteria; of the 35 patients committable under the Stone standard, 32 also met the current Massachusetts criteria for commitment. The clinical and policy implications of the adoption of the Stone criteria are discussed.





Get information about faster international access.

Privacy Policy

Copyright © 1989 American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved.

Home | Search | Current Issue | Past Issues | Subscribe | All APPI Journals | Help | Contact Us

American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. American Psychiatric Association
1000 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1825, Arlington, VA 22209-3901 * 800-368-5777 * appi at psych.org